I posted this on Political Activist's Guide to St. Louis, but I am re-posting because I would really like to have some conversations about this. It has a different title on that blog:
http://pag2stl.blogspot.com/2016/03/thoughts-on-racism-ferguson-and-trump.html
(EDIT: Please note, this post rambles and is kind of incoherent. I
suddenly realized I had an opinion about slavery that I had never
noticed before. It touches on a number of different aspects of things I
have thought about a lot before, but never from the view of "what if a
lot more people owned only a few slaves, instead of a small percentage
owning a large number of slaves". So I apologize, if I am not
presenting completely clear thoughts. I posted this mostly in hopes
that someone would post a link to any books to read that address this.
Or was this myth so embedded in my head that I need to go back and
re-read some things? Without the plantation myth I also realized that I
hadn't fully seen all the roots of these people who think the
Emancipation Proclamation was a bad thing. 26% of Donald Drumpf
supporters, said one meme statistic that I saw on facebook. I don't
know how accurate that is, but I believe it possible. And I believe a
lot of it is handed down from former slave owning families, generation
to generation.)
The Saint Louis library has 6
copies of this book, most of them are in the Stacks at Central, but
Baden and Cabanne have copies on the shelves.
I
just happened to see it while I was wandering around Baden, the kind of
book I would check out anyhow, but it turned out to be enlightening in
terms of the "Drumpf" phenomenon, and the Ferguson/BLM trolls.
In
the introduction, straight away, a major myth about slavery in the
United States is dispelled. Only half of the slaves in the south lived
on plantations, and the slave population on plantations was on average
20. Larger plantations with 50 or more slaves were roughly 20% of
slave-owning populace.
The image of the plantation
slave, surrounded by large numbers of fellow slaves, one among many,
with each other and against their wealthy, white owners, creates a much
different image of slavery than the statistics presented in this book.
The
author examines census reports from Wayne County, Kentucky, and the
statistics show that most slaves lived in close quarters with the white
families that owned them. For women slaves, especially, this must have
been a nightmare, and
Stockholm's Syndrome to escape the misery of reality's truth was
probably frequent, if not permanent. It seems that most slave women in
the census bore mulatto children. Raped by the Master at midnight, up
before dawn to serve him breakfast. And how would the owner's wife not
know?
American Horror Story's Marie Delphine LaLaurie
might have been more gruesome, but I expect African women suffered the
worse abuse from the Mistress.
I haven't read enough
Henry Gates, Jr., or Zora Neale Hurston, and certainly not with this
understanding, to know if the "plantation myth" has been dispelled in
academic circles. (I haven't yet read the Ta-Nehisi Coates Reparations
book yet, but I am glad now I read Streets' book first.) But in popular
myth- even for someone like me, a "white ally" or "white aware"- there
is an image of most slaves living separately from the white owners, with
the Master having to enter the slave quarters to sire more workers and
satisfy whatever sexual predilections he might have- and I imagine there
was a lot of sadism and pedophilia that is not documented.
And
the myth of field hands being jealous of house slaves. Would it have
been a relief to be sold to large plantation, and not be sole focus of
the Master's rape and the Mistress's revenge? Not have to be in the
house at night?
I wonder if the plantation mythos
remains popular because in addition to making it seem as if only a
relatively small percentage of white southerners owned slaves (something
I used to believe before looking at this book) this myth also
substantiates all the historical claims that white people lived in
constant fear of a slave revolt.
With this new
understanding, I think it is more likely that most slave owners lived in
fear of their morning porridge being laced with morning glory seeds.
And because of this threat in close quarters, racism had to be heavily
institutionalized. Too many white slave owners lived with slaves that
used the butcher's knife and machete all day. (I know that's what I
would have been thinking about every time I chopped potatoes.)
Slave
patrols and policing and mobs were the instruments of plantation owners
with their 20 or more slaves. The early version of the riot squad. But
the inability of a person with black skin to find a friend in any part
of Southern society was to ensure that no slave ever get the idea that
they were going to be able to get away from the Master by killing him.
That was the more effective protection for the small, poorer, family
with just a few slaves.
Another thought was that while
very poor whites would always see slaves as both competition for work,
and also the people he could look down upon and feel superior about
their place under the boot of class society- almost the very bottom of
society, but still not an African slave- a labouring slave-owning man
could lease out his and his slaves' time, also putting the white man
with no slaves at a loss.
This revelation gave me some
thoughts on re-examining the Great Scramble's effects on the end of
slavery in the U.S. All the European nations were in a rush to enslave
the African continent when slavery in this country was ending. In my
opinion, (again, I don't know if this academic, I don't see it covered
in general studies and encyclopedias) no European nation and the US
could not repatriate African slaves en masse for fear of the armies that
could potentially be raised.
(And let's not forget
that Haiti had to pay the French back for loss of income after the
revolution. That's right. Haiti finally managed to do that - IN 1950!
So Josephine Baker and Bricktop and Bohemian 1920's Paris aside, the
French government is still just another oppressor, class, racist
nation.)
And I also would like to re-examine the famine
Irish (and the Scots-Irish from the Clearances) that came in the late
1800's in large numbers. Still today racism against black people is
notorious among their descendants. There was a lot of stress between
the Irish already here and the waves of immigrants that came here- up to
the 1950's.
As freed slaves and their children moved
into the cities, the Irish sharecroppers- the Murphy's and Kennedy's and
McDonnell's -that had starved in their own country and been spit on by
other Irish in this country could scapegoat the slaves, many of whom
shared their last names.
The Klansman of today has his
poor, white, slave owning ancestors (not necessarily his own blood
relatives) to thank for the all the mixed African and European DNA in
our society. Not a handful of wealthy plantation owners and white
overseers, but his own historical self. The plantation myth serves
today's white supremacist for this reason, too.
The
supporters of Donald Drumpf that are the real inheritors of the legacy
of widespread, non-plantation slavery. Many families have secrets. But
the poor family with the slave-owning ancestor has probably passed on
stories that were only told in secret to other family members.
Among
a lot of middle class (or middle class cultured) white people, race is
not discussed in polite society. White people that do talk about race,
especially when they talk about African Americans, mark themselves right
away. This is something that I have never been able to describe
satisfactorily.
It is something so inherent in white
American culture, that I think a Ph.D. level thesis paper would be
required. It is not even recognizable to a lot of white people, because
it so instinctive. On both sides.
The white families
that historically or personally mourned the loss of their family slaves
view white people that are less racist- even cultural sensitivity in
professional or work environments- as the outsiders or enemies.
I've
had numerous conversations with white people about this, and everyone
can identify this experience only after it has happened, and after the
other person reveals themselves. For example, during Obama's election
year, during Ferguson, the widespread openness in white society, talking
about race, and finding out that all along, that friend on social
media, or the women that you lunch with at work, have just not been
talking about race openly because they had already identified you as an
outsider.
But when it came out in the open, me and my
friends saw them for racists. And they had been hiding it, ducking all
the conversations about race. Because they recognised me, and people
like me, right away.
What I am talking about is
something that happens that even I don't always see, and I am looking
for it. In fact, I am looking for it so that I can do the same thing!
The careful smile, the quick change of subject, the extra niceness that
was not motivated by any genuine liking but by the desire to keep me
away from the important difference between us that will create issues
when it comes out. Keep it out of the workplace relationship, or the
neighbourhood relationship, etc. They feel like they have to protect
themselves. If their great-great grandaddy didn't own slaves, they wish
that he had.
To them the world is not racist enough.
I see them as being aligned with institutionalized racism, with the
structure and power of racism- but they do not. Donald Drumpf
supporters and white supremacists and capitalists that rely on
institutionalized racism to line their pockets with profits from cheap
labour or justify an invasion or fill an army are becoming the
minority. Drumpf is promising to bring back a time they never lived in-
not in the 1980's or the 1950's, but the 1850's.
These
people had the same complaints in the 1950's and the 1980's. Phyllis
Schlafley spoke at the Donald Drumpf rally last week. She's still
saying the same thing she said 40 years ago when I left St. Louis for
Los Angeles. As I might have written in another post- there is no
America that any of these people lived through that they considered
great. When these Drumpf supporters say "Make America Great Again" I
thought they were talking about the Reagan years and they were just
totally forgetting that they were this unhappy and complaining about
everything back then, too. But just more openly. They still controlled
the culture.
Now I think they are talking about back
in the days when they would have been allowed to own slaves. (I'm
curious enough that if I had the time and money to do some sort of
genealogical research on Drumpf supporters I would. But I bet there are
plenty that just inherited the legacy by osmosis of living in our
society. Manifest Destiny, the Monroe Doctrine, the Taney Code, all of
these contributed with private family stories and histories.)
I
am so thankful that Ferguson and Black Lives Matter have put race and
racism out in the open in our society. As a nation, we need to be
having these conversations. We need for people to be open about what
they really think.
But even that is an affront to the
Drumpf supporter. Because they feel oppressed that they have had to
keep silent distance from people like me. They want the antebellum
south.
Again, "equality feels like oppression to the oppressor, and special treatment to the oppressed."
I
would love to hear any comments or thoughts or feedback on any of
this. Or any suggestions of other good books to read. About 20 years
ago I read a number of Civil War books. They included Gone With The
Wind and Uncle Tom's Cabin. I really hated GWTW, but I didn't like
Uncle Tom's Cabin much. Both were the portraits of plantation life,
although now I want to look at UTC again and see if my ignorance about
individuals owning just a few slaves were the majority caused me to
overlook it. (I don't remember much of it.)
This also
changes how I look at individual slave narratives and biographies, too.
In this case, though, I feel certain that once I start to review them, I
will see that evidence was there, but I wasn't looking for it. A
subconscious assumption of some other explanation- perhaps that slaves
that were owned by poor families and lived lives more isolated from
other slaves might have more opportunities to escape, tell their
stories, etc.
I was always rejecting justifications and
explanations for slavery and racism, but I never knew enough to reject
the "plantations with 50 or more slaves" were the majority.
My fiction writer's mind wonders now if there isn't some sort of former
slave-owning "Marrano"-type secret societies, hidden among us?
(Marrranos are Jews in Portugal and Spain that converted to Catholicism
during the Inquistion but secretly continued private rituals among the
families for hundreds of years. They married among other Marrano
families and even had their own dialect. Some families that came out of
the closet after World War 2 did not even realize that their secret
tradition was founded in Judaism, and not witchcraft or pagan
practices.
(EDIT I shouldn't have to add this, but just in case, let me be clear
I am not comparing the Marrano's need for secrecy with people who want
to own slaves like grandaddy did, just that the Marranos had a secret
society that rivals the theories about Illuminati secret societies, and
the Marranos are well documented.))
One final loose thought, I wonder now, too,
about the Caribbean and Mexico, Central, and South America, and the
slavery situation there? Is the plantation majority true in other
countries?
These are all things I hope to investigate,
and that I think are relevant today, in order to understand how to
eradicate racism all together.